Skip to content
Hon Martin Hamilton-Smith
Setting the agenda
Hon Martin Hamilton-SmithHon Martin Hamilton-Smith

Hon Martin Hamilton-Smith

Twitter page opens in new window
  • Home
  • About Martin
    • CV
    • Ministerial Record
  • Public Policy
    • Good Government
    • Defence
    • Space Industry
    • Investment and Trade
    • China
  • Australian Sovereign Capability Alliance
    • Purpose and Vision
    • Functions and Funding
    • Academic Reports
    • Articles of interest
    • ASCA Contact
  • Media
    • Media Articles and Opinion
    • Media Releases
    • Current Issues
    • Speeches
    • Newsletters
    • Books and Publications
    • Videos and Podcasts
    • Photo Gallery
  • Contact
Search:
  • Home
  • About Martin
    • CV
    • Ministerial Record
  • Public Policy
    • Good Government
    • Defence
    • Space Industry
    • Investment and Trade
    • China
  • Australian Sovereign Capability Alliance
    • Purpose and Vision
    • Functions and Funding
    • Academic Reports
    • Articles of interest
    • ASCA Contact
  • Media
    • Media Articles and Opinion
    • Media Releases
    • Current Issues
    • Speeches
    • Newsletters
    • Books and Publications
    • Videos and Podcasts
    • Photo Gallery
  • Contact

New expert economic report supports an Australian submarine build

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Media Releases
  3. New expert economic report supports…

A new report has for the first time exposed the extent of the economic impact that building submarines overseas would have on local government regions – identifying the real winners and losers.

Expert modelling has also been used to pin point the difference in tax recoupment figures, which were previously not considered when comparing domestic or overseas build scenarios.
The South Australian Economic Development Board commissioned the expert analysis from the independent National Institute of Economic and Industry Research to assess the economic ramifications of purchasing 12 submarines overseas (eg. the Japanese Soryu class) to replace Australia’s existing Collins class vessels as compared to building the submarines in Australia together with a foreign design partner.

The Minister for Defence Industries Martin Hamilton-Smith said that the clear conclusion of the report is that there would be no difference in the price for the submarines if they were built overseas as compared to built in Australia. However it would have a devastating economic ripple affect throughout Australia if the contracts went overseas.

“This report provides a clear breakdown of the cash and jobs implications that this decision would have on local council regions throughout Australia and I encourage each council to contact the Economic Development Board for more information.”

The economic report found that under any scenario, the cost of a new fleet of submarines would be borne by Australians and there are two separate components to this cost. The first is the impact on the Commonwealth Government (see Table 1) and the second is the impact on the economy (see Tables 2 and 3).

Table 1 indicates two significant benefits to the Government from building in Australia:

First, an estimated $5.5 billion of tax is recouped by the Government. Under the “no change to budget” assumption in this model, this reduces by $5.5 billion, the need to cut other Government programs to cover the cost of the submarines.

Second, if the submarines are bought overseas there is a $6.2 billion increase in the cost to the Australian Federal Government if the AUD mean exchange rate reverts to a purchasing-power parity of $0.74 US cents as compared to the models of $0.92 US cents. This cost excludes the hedging cost (estimated at around $3 billion for a Japanese purchase) and the pricing of the counter party risk reduction in counter party risk.

Table 1

Australia ($m)

Total Cost to Commonwealth Government

 @0.92 USD

 @0.74 USD

Cash cost: build overseas

         21,114

         28,344

Tax recoupment from building overseas

               624

               624

Net cost to Commonwealth Government

         20,490

         27,720

Cash cost: build in Australia

         20,957

         21,960

Tax recoupment from building in Australia

           6,011

           6,011

Net cost to Commonwealth Government

         14,946

         15,949

Saving in net cost to Commonwealth Government if built in Australia

           5,545

         11,771


Table 2 summarises the more favourable economic impact on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Australia and on the Gross Regional Product (GRP) of the States and Territories from building in Australia.  The table indicates that Australia is “better off” by around $21 billion and that every State and Territory benefits.

 

Table 2: Total Impact on GDP/GRP

Australia

$m

South Australia

$m

Western Australia

$m

Other States

$m

Scenario 1 – build overseas

–  29,344

–  2,193

–  786

–  26,366

Scenario 2 – build in Australia

–    8,207

11,081

2,046

–  21,333

Amount by which Scenario 2 is better than Scenario 1 for the economy

21,137

13,274

2,832

5,032

 

 

Table 3 summarises the difference in impacts between the two scenarios as relates to average jobs over the life of the program. The table indicates that Australia is “better off” by more than 3,000 jobs per year for 40 years and that every State and Territory benefits.

 

Table 3: Total Impact on Jobs

Australia

average number of jobs each  year for 40 years

South Australia

average number of jobs each year for 40 years

Western Australia

average number of jobs each  year for 40 years

Other States

average number of jobs each  year for 40 years

Additional direct employment: Scenario 2

797

378

345

Category: Media Releases21 October, 2014

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Former Liberal leader Martin Hamilton-Smith plans to back his own independent candidates in two looming state by-electionsNextNext post:Building subs in Japan is ‘scandalous’

Related Posts

COVID exposed Australia’s industrial weakness
9 September, 2021
The Express Newspaper – February 2018
22 February, 2018
Public Policy

Good Government
Defence
Space Industry
Investment and Trade
China

ASCA Specialisations

Defence and Space
Health
Energy and Infrastructure
Science, Communications & Technology
Advanced Manufacturing

Contact Martin Hamilton-Smith

Post: PO Box 65, Stirling SA 5152
Phone: +61 8 8339 4389
Email Martin Hamilton-Smith

Would you or your organisation like to help fund further research?

Contact the Australian Sovereign Capability Alliance

Post: PO Box 65, Stirling SA 5152
Phone: +61 8 8339 4389
Email ASCA

Hon Martin Hamilton-Smith
© Martin Hamilton-Smith & The Australian Sovereign Capability Alliance 2022

Privacy & Disclaimer | Accessibility

Go to Top